The impact of cage dividers on mouse aggression, dominance and hormone levels

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0297358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297358. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Home cage aggression in group-housed male mice is a major welfare concern and may compromise animal research. Conventional cages prevent flight or retreat from sight, increasing the risk that agonistic encounters will result in injury. Moreover, depending on social rank, mice vary in their phenotype, and these effects seem highly variable and dependent on the social context. Interventions that reduce aggression, therefore, may reduce not only injuries and stress, but also variability between cage mates. Here we housed male mice (Balb/c and SWISS, group sizes of three and five) with or without partial cage dividers for two months. Mice were inspected for wounding weekly and home cages were recorded during housing and after 6h isolation housing, to assess aggression and assign individual social ranks. Fecal boli and fur were collected to quantify steroid levels. We found no evidence that the provision of cage dividers improves the welfare of group housed male mice; The prevalence of injuries and steroid levels was similar between the two housing conditions and aggression was reduced only in Balb/c strain. However, mice housed with cage dividers developed less despotic hierarchies and had more stable social ranks. We also found a relationship between hormone levels and social rank depending on housing type. Therefore, addition of cage dividers may play a role in stabilizing social ranks and modulating the activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axes, thus reducing phenotypic variability between mice of different ranks.

MeSH terms

  • Aggression* / physiology
  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal* / physiology
  • Hormones
  • Housing, Animal
  • Male
  • Mice
  • Steroids

Substances

  • Steroids
  • Hormones

Grants and funding

The study was funded by the Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO; Contract No. 714001679). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.