Objectives: To review studies on deep learning (DL) models for classification, detection, and segmentation of rib fractures in CT data, to determine their risk of bias (ROB), and to analyse the performance of acute rib fracture detection models.
Methods: Research articles written in English were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in April 2023. A study was only included if a DL model was used to classify, detect, or segment rib fractures, and only if the model was trained with CT data from humans. For the ROB assessment, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used. The performance of acute rib fracture detection models was meta-analysed with forest plots.
Results: A total of 27 studies were selected. About 75% of the studies have ROB by not reporting the patient selection criteria, including control patients or using 5-mm slice thickness CT scans. The sensitivity, precision, and F1-score of the subgroup of low ROB studies were 89.60% (95%CI, 86.31%-92.90%), 84.89% (95%CI, 81.59%-88.18%), and 86.66% (95%CI, 84.62%-88.71%), respectively. The ROB subgroup differences test for the F1-score led to a p-value below 0.1.
Conclusion: ROB in studies mostly stems from an inappropriate patient and data selection. The studies with low ROB have better F1-score in acute rib fracture detection using DL models.
Advances in knowledge: This systematic review will be a reference to the taxonomy of the current status of rib fracture detection with DL models, and upcoming studies will benefit from our data extraction, our ROB assessment, and our meta-analysis.
Keywords: CT; computed tomography; deep learning; rib fracture.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology.