Background: This study aimed to retrospectively assess results of intracranial meningioma surgery with or without intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in a single institution.
Methods: Two cohorts (a historical cohort and a monitoring cohort) were collected for the analysis. Before IONM was introduced, a total of 107 patients underwent intracranial meningioma operation without IONM from January 2000 to December 2008 by one neurosurgeon (historical cohort). After IONM was introduced, a total of 99 patients with intracranial meningioma were operated under IONM between November 2018 and February 2023 by two neurosurgeons (monitoring cohort). A retrospective comparison was made on the complications from meningioma surgery between the two groups.
Results: In the monitoring cohort, warning signals of motor evoked potential (MEPs) or somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs) were alarmed in 10 patients. Two of these 10 patients aborted the operation and eight of these 10 patients with warning signals underwent tumor resection. Of these eight patients, five showed postoperative morbidity. Five of 89 patients without warning signals developed neurological deficits. In the historical cohort, 14 of 107 patients showed postoperative morbidity or mortality.
Conclusion: Even after successful resection of intracranial meningiomas prior to the advent of IONM, integration of MEPs and SSEPs monitoring yielded valuable insights for surgical teams during operative procedures.
Keywords: Evoked potentials; Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; Meningioma; Morbidity; Surgery.
Copyright © 2024 The Korean Brain Tumor Society, The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology, and The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.