Investigating concurrent validity of inertial sensors to evaluate multiplanar spine movement

Kristen H E Beange; Adrian D C Chan; Ryan B Graham

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111939

Investigating concurrent validity of inertial sensors to evaluate multiplanar spine movement

J Biomech. 2024 Feb:164:111939. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111939. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

Authors

Kristen H E Beange¹, Adrian D C Chan², Ryan B Graham³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Design, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada; Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
² Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Design, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada; School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada; Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
³ School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada; Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: rgraham@uottawa.ca.

PMID: 38310004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111939

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a portable and inexpensive alternative to traditional optical motion capture systems, and have potential to support clinical diagnosis and treatment of low back pain; however, due to a lack of confidence regarding the validity of IMU-derived metrics, their uptake and acceptance remain a challenge. The objective of this work was to assess the concurrent validity of the Xsens DOT IMUs for tracking multiplanar spine movement, and to evaluate concurrent validity and reliability for estimating clinically relevant metrics relative to gold-standard optical motion capture equipment. Ten healthy controls performed spine range of motion (ROM) tasks, while data were simultaneously tracked from IMUs and optical marker clusters placed over the C7, T12, and S1 vertebrae. Root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC_2,1) were calculated to assess validity and reliability of absolute (abs; C7, T12, and S1 sensors) and relative joint (rel; intersegmental thoracic, lumbar, and total) motion. Overall RMSE_abs = 1.33°, MAE_abs = 0.74° ± 0.69, and ICC_2,1,abs = 0.953 across all movements, sensors, and planes. Results were slightly better for uniplanar movements when evaluating the primary rotation axis (prim) absolute ROM (MAE_abs,prim = 0.56° ± 0.49; ICC_2,1,abs,prim = 0.999). Similarly, when evaluating relative intersegmental motion, overall RMSE_rel = 2.39°, MAE_rel = 1.10° ± 0.96, and ICC_2,1,rel = 0.950, and relative primary rotation axis achieved MAE_rel,prim = 0.87° ± 0.77, and ICC_2,1,rel,prim = 0.994. Findings from this study suggest that these IMUs can be considered valid for tracking multiplanar spine movement, and may be used to objectively assess spine movement and neuromuscular control in clinics.

Keywords: Clinical assessment; Inertial measurement units; Low back pain; Spine movement.

MeSH terms

Biomechanical Phenomena
Humans
Low Back Pain*
Movement*
Range of Motion, Articular
Reproducibility of Results
Rotation
Sacrum