Background: The retention volume of autologous fat grafts decreases after transplantation due to limited nutrition infiltration and insufficient blood supply. Structural fat grafts and the 3M (multipoint, multitunnel, and multilayer) injection technique have been considered to improve the survival of grafts; however, it is difficult for surgeons to practice in the clinic because grafts tend to gather into a cluster, especially in large volume fat grafting. Therefore, we hypothesize that prefabricated microparticle fat grafts (PFMG) may improve the retention rate.
Methods: The C57BL/6 mouse fat particles were embedded in growth factor-reduced (GFR)-Matrigel to detect cell migration by immunofluorescence staining in vitro. PFMG was prepared by mixing mouse fat particles and GFR Matrigel in a 1:1 volume ratio and injected subcutaneously into C57BL/6 mice. Fat particles mixed with PBS in equal volume served as control group. The grafts were harvested at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after sacrifice. The retention rate of grafts at each time point was measured, and the structural alterations were detected by SEM. Fat necrosis and blood vessel density were evaluated by histological analysis.
Results: CD34+ cells are migrated from the PFMG and formed a tree-like tubular network in the in vitro study. The retention rate was higher in the PFMG group than in the control group at week 12 (38% vs. 30%, p < 0.05). After transplantation, the dissociated structure of fat particles was maintained in PFMG by SEM analysis. Histological analysis of PFMG confirmed less fat necrosis and more blood vessel density in the PFMG group at the early stage than in the control group. The GFR Matrigel was displaced by adipose tissue with time.
Conclusions: In this study, we developed a novel fat grafting method, PFMG that dispersed fat grafts and maintained the structure after transplantation. High volume retention volume of PFMG was achieved by promoting cell migration and vessel regeneration.
No level assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.