Estimating person-specific neural correlates of mental rotation: A machine learning approach

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0289094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289094. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Using neurophysiological measures to model how the brain performs complex cognitive tasks such as mental rotation is a promising way towards precise predictions of behavioural responses. The mental rotation task requires objects to be mentally rotated in space. It has been used to monitor progressive neurological disorders. Up until now, research on neural correlates of mental rotation have largely focused on group analyses yielding models with features common across individuals. Here, we propose an individually tailored machine learning approach to identify person-specific patterns of neural activity during mental rotation. We trained ridge regressions to predict the reaction time of correct responses in a mental rotation task using task-related, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity of the same person. When tested on independent data of the same person, the regression model predicted the reaction times significantly more accurately than when only the average reaction time was used for prediction (bootstrap mean difference of 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.03, p < .001). When tested on another person's data, the predictions were significantly less accurate compared to within-person predictions. Further analyses revealed that considering person-specific reaction times and topographical activity patterns substantially improved a model's generalizability. Our results indicate that a more individualized approach towards neural correlates can improve their predictive performance of behavioural responses, particularly when combined with machine learning.

MeSH terms

  • Brain* / physiology
  • Electroencephalography* / methods
  • Head
  • Humans
  • Reaction Time / physiology

Grants and funding

This work is part of the Doctoral Training Unit Data-driven computational modelling and applications (DRIVEN) and is funded by the Luxembourg National Research Fund under the PRIDE programme (PRIDE17/12252781). The funders provided support in the form of salary for author SU. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.