Objective: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Rezūm therapy and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate (B-TURP) for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) of 50-120 g size.
Methods: One hundred patients with BPH who met the inclusion criteria were included and split into two equal groups to undergo Rezūm therapy or B-TURP. The two groups were compared for efficacy using international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), operative time, catheter time, hospital stay, post-void residual urine (PVR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and residual prostate size and safety using the incidence of complications.
Results: Rezūm significantly ameliorated IPSS from the baseline score by 55.3%, QoL by 50%, Qmax by 62.5%, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) by 7.1%, PVR by 50%, residual prostate size by 28.1% and PSA by 42% at 2 years. Meanwhile, the improvement in B-TURP was significantly higher than Rezūm group, Rezūm therapy had a significantly shorter duration of operative time and hospital stay. Also, it had fewer complications in comparison with B-TURP.
Conclusions: Rezūm is a minimally invasive procedure that provides significantly improved symptomatic relief of BPH and quality of life with preservation of erectile and ejaculatory functions. However, it is not as effective as B-TURP.
Keywords: BPH; B‐TURP; LUTS; Rezūm; thermal therapy.
© 2024 The Japanese Urological Association.