Cost-effectiveness of a government policy to incentivise chronic disease management following stroke: a modelling study

Neuroepidemiology. 2024 Jan 30. doi: 10.1159/000536224. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the cost-effectiveness of government policies that support primary care physicians to provide comprehensive chronic disease management (CDM).

Aims: To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of CDM policies, over a lifetime, in long-time survivors of stroke.

Methods: A Markov model, using three health states (stable, hospitalised, dead), was developed to simulate the costs and benefits of CDM policies over 30 years (with 1-year cycles). Transition probabilities and costs from a health system perspective were obtained from the linkage of data between the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (cohort n=12,368, 42% female, median age 70 years, 45% had a claim) and government-held hospital, Medicare, and pharmaceutical claims datasets. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were obtained from a comparable cohort (n=512, 34% female, median age 69.6 years, 52% had a claim) linked with Medicare claims and death data. A 3% discount rate was applied to costs in Australian dollars (AUD, 2016) and QALYs beyond 12 months. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to understand uncertainty.

Results: Per-person average total lifetime costs were AUD142,939 and 8.97 QALYs for those with a claim, and AUD103,889 and 8.98 QALYs for those without a claim. This indicates that these CDM policies were costlier without improving QALYs. The probability of cost-effectiveness of CDM was 26.1%, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD50,000/QALY.

Conclusion: CDM policies, designed to encourage comprehensive care, are unlikely to be cost-effective for stroke compared to care without CDM. Further research to understand how to deliver such care in a cost-effective manner is needed.