Background and aims: Re-induction optimization of ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease (CD) patients who experienced a loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab. However, whether continuous multiple intravenous optimization is better than single dose re-induction remains unknown. We aimed to compare effectiveness of two strategies in CD patients with LOR to ustekinumab.
Methods: We retrospectively included CD patients who had LOR to standardized ustekinumab therapy. They were divided into three groups according to different times (one to three) for re-induction.
Results: This study included 50, 26 and 22 of 98 eligible patients in one intravenous re-induction subgroup, double intravenous re-induction subgroup and three intravenous re-induction subgroup, respectively. At week 24, 67.3%, 75.5%, 56.6%, 69.8% and 61.2% of all achieved steriod free clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response and C-reactive protein normalization, respectively. No differences were found in all endpoints between three groups. Ustekinumab trough level at week 24 but not times of re-induction showed a tendency to predict clinical remission. No serious adverse events were found in this cohort.
Conclusion: Intravenous re-induction was safe and effective in CD patients who experienced LOR to ustekinumab. Trough level of ustekinumab but not times of intravenous re-induction may associated with clinical efficacy.
Keywords: Crohn's disease; Intravenous re-induction; Loss of response; Ustekinumab.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.