Background: No studies have been retrieved comparing perfluorobutane with sulfur hexafluoride for microwave ablation (MWA) in small hepatocellular carcinoma(sHCC).
Objective: To retrospective investigate the value of perfluorobutane ultrasonography contrast agent in ultrasonography (US)-guided MWA of sHCC.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective clinical controlled study about US-guided percutaneous MWA in patients with sHCC, and in patients undergoing intra-operative treatment with perfluorobutane or sulfur hexafluoride. In both groups, a contrast agent was injected to clear the tumor and then a needle was inserted. A 5-point needle prick difficulty score was developed to compare needle prick difficulty in the two groups of cases.
Results: A total of 67 patients were included: 25 patients in group perfluorobutane, aged 41-82 (60.64±9.46), tumor size 1.1-2.8 (1.78±0.45) cm. 42 patients in group sulfur hexafluoride, aged 38-78 (62.26±9.27), with tumor size of 1.1-3.0 (1.89±0.49) cm. There was no significant difference in age or tumor size in both groups (P > 0.05). Puncture difficulty score (5-point): 2.0-2.7 (2.28±0.29) in group perfluorobutane, and 2.0-4.7 (2.95±0.85) in group sulfur hexafluoride, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Enhanced imaging results within 3 months after surgery: complete ablation rate was 100% (25/25) in the group perfluorobutane, 95.2% (40/42 in the group sulfur hexafluoride), with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Perfluorobutane kupffer phase can make the operator accurately deploy the ablation needle and reduce the difficulty of operation.
Keywords: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS); kupffer; liver cancer; microwave ablation (MWA); perfluorobutane (Sonazoid).