High-Intensity Interval Training Combined with High-Load Strength Training Improves Aerobic Fitness, Match Goals and Match Result during the In-Season Period in Under-19 Soccer Players

Pierros Thomakos; Konstantinos Spyrou; Athanasios Tsoukos; Christos Katsikas; Gregory C Bogdanis

doi:10.3390/sports12010002

High-Intensity Interval Training Combined with High-Load Strength Training Improves Aerobic Fitness, Match Goals and Match Result during the In-Season Period in Under-19 Soccer Players

Sports (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;12(1):2. doi: 10.3390/sports12010002.

Authors

Pierros Thomakos¹, Konstantinos Spyrou^{2

3}, Athanasios Tsoukos¹, Christos Katsikas¹, Gregory C Bogdanis¹

Affiliations

¹ School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 17237 Dafne, Greece.
² UCAM Research Center for High Performance Sport, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30005 Murcia, Spain.
³ Facultad de Deporte, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30005 Murcia, Spain.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of adding a weekly session of either strength training followed by high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or high load plyometric training followed by small-sided games (SSG) on aerobic fitness, goals scored and conceded, and match results. Twenty-nine players from two youth elite teams competing in an under 19 (U19) first division league took part in the study. Of those, 16 players from one team followed the HIIT program (age: 17.8 ± 0.6 years) and 13 players from the other team trained once a week, following the SSG program (age: 18.0 ± 0.6 years). The training intervention lasted for 11 weeks and was applied once per week. For the HIIT team it included high-load strength training (80-95% of 1 RM) followed by high-intensity intermittent running, whereas for the SSG team (n = 13) it included plyometric exercises followed by SSG. Aerobic fitness was assessed before and after the intervention, while goals scored and conceded, as well as match results during the intervention period, were compared with the 11-week period preceding it. Only the HIIT team improved Yo-Yo IR2 performance (running distance: from 902.5 ± 147.5 to 1092.5 ± 155.8 m, p < 0.001) while there was no change for the SSG group. Moreover, during the 11-week intervention, the HIIT team improved the number of goals scored in the last 30 min of the game compared with the pre-intervention period (0.36 ± 0.50 to 1.27 ± 0.90 per match, p < 0.05) and the scored vs. conceded goals were higher in the second half (1.36 ± 1.03 vs. 0.27 ± 0.47, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for these parameters in the SSG team. Regarding match result, the HIIT team increased the proportion of wins from 5 wins in 11 matches (or 45%) in the pre-intervention period to 9 wins in 11 matches (or 82%) during the intervention period, while this profile remained unchanged for the SSG team. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the HIIT program performed once per week was superior to SSG as it improves aerobic fitness, scored and conceded goals, and match result during the in-season period.

Keywords: aerobic fitness training; goals scored; match results; resistance training.

Grants and funding

This research received funding (publication fees only) from the Special Account for Research Grants of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.