Reliability and Accuracy of the Pediatric Swiss Emergency Triage Scale-the SETSped Study

Christophe A Fehlmann; Sophie Garcin; Antoine Poncet; Christophe Marti; Olivier T Rutschmann; Gabriel Brandle; Tamara Faundez; Josette Simon; Tatiana Delieutraz; Olivier Grosgurin

doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003127

Reliability and Accuracy of the Pediatric Swiss Emergency Triage Scale-the SETSped Study

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Jan 25. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003127. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Christophe A Fehlmann¹, Sophie Garcin¹, Antoine Poncet, Christophe Marti², Olivier T Rutschmann³, Gabriel Brandle⁴, Tamara Faundez⁵, Josette Simon¹, Tatiana Delieutraz, Olivier Grosgurin

Affiliations

¹ From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
² Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
³ Magellan Medical Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
⁴ Pediatric Emergency Department, Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes, Chêne-Bougerie, Switzerland.
⁵ Pediatric Emergency Department, Clinique et Permanence d'Onex, Onex, Switzerland.

PMID: 38270474
DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003127

Abstract

Background and importance: The Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS) is an adult triage tool used in several emergency departments. It has been recently adapted to the pediatric population but, before advocating for its use, performance assessment of this tool is needed.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and the accuracy of the pediatric version of the SETS for the triage of pediatric patients.

Design, setting, and participants: This study was a cross-sectional study among a sample of emergency triage nurses (ETNs) exposed to 17 clinical scenarios using a computerized simulator.

Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was the reliability of the triage level performed by the ETNs. It was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient.Secondary outcomes included accuracy of triage compared with expert-based triage levels and factors associated with accurate triage.

Main results: Eighteen ETNs participated in the study and completed the evaluation of all scenarios, for a total of 306 triage decisions. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91), with an agreement by scenario ranging from 61.1% to 100%. The overall accuracy was 85.8%, and nurses were more likely to undertriage (16.0%) than to overtriage (4.3%). No factor for accurate triage was identified.

Conclusions: This simulator-based study showed that the SETS is reliable and accurate among a pediatric population. Future research is needed to confirm these results, compare this triage scale head-to-head with other recognized international tools, and study the SETSped in real-life setting.