Patient-specific rods in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review

Bryce Picton; Lauren E Stone; Jason Liang; Sean S Solomon; Nolan J Brown; Sophia Luzzi; Joseph A Osorio; Martin H Pham

doi:10.1007/s43390-023-00805-8

Patient-specific rods in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review

Spine Deform. 2024 Jan 24. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00805-8. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Bryce Picton¹, Lauren E Stone², Jason Liang³, Sean S Solomon³, Nolan J Brown³, Sophia Luzzi³, Joseph A Osorio², Martin H Pham²

Affiliations

¹ School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Dr, Orange, CA, 92868, USA. bpicton@hs.uci.edu.
² Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
³ School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Dr, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.

PMID: 38265734
DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00805-8

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of patient-specific rods for adult spinal deformity.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed through an electronic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Human studies between 2012 and 2023 were included. Sample size, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), operation time, blood loss, follow-up duration, and complications were recorded for each study when available.

Results: Seven studies with a total of 304 adult spinal deformity patients of various etiologies were included. All studies reported SVA, and PT; two studies did not report PI-LL. Four studies reported planned radiographic outcomes. Two found a significant association between preoperative plan and postoperative outcome in all three outcomes. One found a significant association for PI-LL alone. The fourth found no significant associations. SVA improved in six of seven studies, PI-LL improved in all five, and three of seven studies found improved postoperative PT. Significance of these results varied greatly by study.

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits of PSRs in achieving optimal spino-pelvic parameters in ASD surgery. Nevertheless, conclusions regarding the superiority of PSRs over traditional rods must be judiciously drawn, given the heterogeneity of patients and study methodologies, potential confounding variables, and the absence of robust randomized controlled trials. Future investigations should concentrate on enhancing preoperative planning, standardizing surgical methodologies, isolating specific patient subgroups, and head-to-head comparisons with traditional rods to fully elucidate the impact of PSRs in ASD surgery.

Keywords: Machine learning; Operative planning; Patient-specific rods; Spinal deformity.

Publication types

Review