Cellular stress is a fundamental component of age-associated disease. Cells encounter various forms of stress - oxidative stress, protein misfolding, DNA damage, etc. - and respond by activating specific, well-defined stress response pathways. As we age, the burden of stress and resulting damage increases while our cells' ability to deal with the consequences becomes diminished due to dysregulation of cellular stress response pathways. Many interventions that extend lifespan activate one or more stress response pathways or allow cells to maintain normal stress response later in life. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a commonly used model for both aging and stress response research. As such, stress response experiments are regularly conducted as part of studies focused on mechanisms of aging in C. elegans. However, experimental design across experiments in the field are highly variable, including stressor dose, age at exposure, culture type (liquid vs. solid), bacterial strain used as a food source, and environmental temperature. These differences can result in different experimental outcomes, making comparison of results between studies challenging. Here we evaluate several experimental variables that are variable in the published literature and find that each can meaningfully alter experimental outcomes for multiple stressors. Our goal is to raise awareness of the issue of experimental variability within the field and suggest a standardized experimental design to serve as a set of guidelines for future experiments. By adopting these guidelines as a starting point, and explicitly noting differences in specific experiments, we aim to promote rigor and reproducibility, ultimately fostering more interpretable and translatable outcomes in geroscience research.