The Prevalence of Disordered Eating Behaviours (DEBs) among Adolescent Female School Students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Nutrients. 2024 Jan 17;16(2):281. doi: 10.3390/nu16020281.

Abstract

Adolescence is a sensitive stage of life that is particularly vulnerable to nutritional problems, including DEBs. This cross-sectional study aims to explore the prevalence of DEBs among adolescent female school students in four intermediate and secondary schools in the city of Riyadh and to examine predictors associated with DEBs, including age, BMI and school regions. A total of 416 female students aged 12-19 years took part in this study. Weight and height were measured for students before the EAT-26 test was completed. Overweight and obesity were observed among 37.7% (n = 157) of students, 50.7% (n = 211) had a normal BMI and 11.5% (n = 48) were underweight. Results indicated that 123 (29.6%) students reported an EAT-26 score of 20 or more, indicating a high risk of DEB. Age was a significant predictor of DEB risk (OR = 3.087, 95% CI = 1.228-7.760), with the older age group (16-19 years) reporting a higher risk than the younger age group (12-15 years) (p = 0.017). DEB risk partially differed by school region, but BMI was not a statistically significant predictor. The high-risk group reported more binging (p = 0.008), induced vomiting (p < 0.001), laxative consumption (p < 0.001) and exercising (p < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group. Further research is warranted to understand DEB current patterns and predictors.

Keywords: BMI; EAT-26; Saudi Arabia; adolescents; age; disordered eating behaviours; eating disorders; region; weight.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Feeding and Eating Disorders* / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Prevalence
  • Saudi Arabia / epidemiology
  • Schools*
  • Students
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study is one of the outputs of AA’s PhD project, which was funded by the Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau in the UK. The views and opinions mentioned in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Cultural Bureau.