[Arterial spin labeling in assessment of interstitial fibrosis in renal allografts]

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 23;104(4):276-281. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230726-00095.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To explore the feasibility and application value of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in evaluating the degree of renal fibrosis after kidney transplantation. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Renal transplant recipients who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from December 2021 to December 2022 were enrolled. All participants underwent ASL scan, and the values of renal cortical renal blood flow (RBF) were measured through post-processing software. The participants were divided into different groups according to the Banff interstitial fibrosis score (ci score) of the transplanted kidneys, and then relevant indicators were compared. One-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare the differences in renal cortical RBF among the groups. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to investigate the association between renal cortical RBF and ci score of the transplanted kidney. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the diagnostic effectiveness of renal cortical RBF and laboratory indicators for distinguishing varying degrees of fibrosis in transplanted kidneys. The Delong test was utilized to compare the area under the curve (AUC). Results: A total of 60 patients (42 males and 18 females) were included in the study, with a mean age of (44.6±10.8) years. All patients were divided into 4 groups: ci0 group (ci score=0, 11 cases), ci1 group (ci score=1, 21 cases), ci2 group (ci score=2, 20 cases), and ci3 group (ci score=3, 8 cases). With an increase in the degree of fibrosis in the transplanted kidney, there was a corresponding decrease in the renal cortical RBF value. The differences in renal cortical RBF values among the 4 groups were statistically significant[ci0 group: (214.9±28.5) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci1 group: (181.7±29.3) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci2 group: (158.8±39.2) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci3 group: (123.1±27.2) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; F=14.02, P<0.001]. The renal cortical RBF was moderately negatively correlated with the ci score (r=-0.644, P<0.001). The AUC for discriminating between ci0 and ci1-3 of renal cortical RBF and 24-hour urine protein was 0.881 (95%CI: 0.772-0.950) and 0.680 (95%CI: 0.547-0.795), respectively. The AUC for renal cortical RBF was significantly higher than that for 24-hour urine protein (P=0.047). The renal cortical RBF can distinguish between ci0-1 and ci2-3, as well as ci0-2 and ci3, with the corresponding AUC value of 0.796 (95%CI: 0.673-0.889) and 0.900 (95%CI: 0.795-0.963), respectively. Conclusion: ASL can quantitatively assess renal blood perfusion in transplanted kidneys and demonstrates high operational efficacy in distinguishing varying degrees of fibrosis in the transplanted kidneys.

目的: 探讨磁共振成像技术动脉自旋标记(ASL)评估肾移植术后移植肾纤维化程度的可行性及其应用价值。 方法: 横断面研究。纳入2021年12月至2022年12月于苏州大学附属第一医院就诊的移植肾受者,所有受试者均行ASL磁共振检查,通过后处理软件获得移植肾血流参数,即肾皮质肾血流量(RBF)。根据患者移植肾Banff纤维化评分进行分组比较。采用单因素方差分析比较各组间移植肾皮质RBF的差异;采用Spearman相关分析肾皮质RBF与移植肾纤维化评分的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析肾皮质RBF及实验室指标鉴别不同纤维化程度移植肾的能力,使用Delong检验比较曲线下面积(AUC)。 结果: 共纳入60例患者,男42例,女18例,年龄(44.6±10.8)岁。患者根据Banff纤维化评分分为4组:ci0组(纤维化评分0分,11例)、ci1组(纤维化评分1分,21例)、ci2组(纤维化评分2分,20例)、ci3组(纤维化评分3分,8例)。随着移植肾纤维化程度加重,肾皮质RBF趋于减小,ci0~3组肾皮质RBF分别为(214.9±28.5)、(181.7±29.3)、(158.8±39.2)、(123.1±27.2)ml·(100 g)-1·min-1,差异有统计学意义(F=14.02,P<0.001)。移植肾皮质RBF与Banff纤维化评分呈中度负相关(r=-0.644,P<0.001)。移植肾皮质RBF和24 h尿蛋白区分ci0和ci1~3的AUC分别为0.881(95%CI:0.772~0.950)和0.680(95%CI:0.547~0.795),肾皮质RBF的AUC高于24 h尿蛋白(P=0.047)。肾皮质RBF区分ci0~1和ci2~3、ci0~2和ci3的AUC分别为0.796(95%CI:0.673~0.889)和0.900(95%CI:0.795~0.963)。 结论: ASL能够定量评估移植肾血流灌注,对于区分不同纤维化程度的移植肾均有较高的效能。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Allografts
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Fibrosis
  • Humans
  • Kidney
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged