Comparison of surgical outcomes of transoral robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Head Neck. 2024 Mar;46(3):688-701. doi: 10.1002/hed.27644. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA), concurrently compared with conventional transcervical thyroidectomy (CTT). A network meta-analysis, comprising 23 studies, was performed in this study. The operative time of the CTT group was significantly shorter than that of the TOETVA and TORT groups. The hospital stay of the TOETVA group was significantly longer than that of the CTT group. Rates of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and total complications were higher in association with TOETVA than with TORT. No significant differences were found between the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative pain, and other complications. Cosmetic satisfaction was significantly superior with TORT and TOETVA than with CTT. Compared with CTT, TOETVA and TORT showed superior cosmesis but no significant difference in surgical outcomes except for operative time and hospital stay.

Keywords: TOETVA; TORT; network meta-analysis; systematic review; thyroidectomy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery*
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Operative Time
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures*
  • Thyroid Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Thyroidectomy / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome