Implementing integrative therapies in adult critical care: Barriers and strategies

Elizabeth Papathanassoglou; Tanya Park; Neelam Punjani; Bijaya Pokharel; Maysa Taha; Kathleen Hegadoren

doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2023.11.002

Implementing integrative therapies in adult critical care: Barriers and strategies

Aust Crit Care. 2024 Jan 12:S1036-7314(23)00192-3. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.11.002. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Elizabeth Papathanassoglou¹, Tanya Park², Neelam Punjani³, Bijaya Pokharel⁴, Maysa Taha⁵, Kathleen Hegadoren⁶

Affiliations

¹ University of Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: papathan@ualberta.ca.
² University of Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: tmpark@ualberta.ca.
³ University of Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: npunjani@ualberta.ca.
⁴ La Trobe University, Australia. Electronic address: b.pokharel@latrobe.edu.au.
⁵ University of Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: mtaha@ualberta.ca.
⁶ University of Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: kathy.hegadoren@ualberta.ca.

PMID: 38218673
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.11.002

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients experience intense physical and psychological stressors in the intensive care unit (ICU). More than half of ICU survivors report overwhelming mental health symptoms after ICU discharge, such as post-traumatic stress symptoms, anxiety, and depression. Relaxation-inducing integrative therapies such as guided imagery, massage, therapeutic touch, music therapy, and spirituality-based healing practices have the potential to promote comfort and relaxation and improve patient outcomes.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards the implementation of relaxation-inducing integrative therapies in critical care, barriers to implementation, and potential strategies to overcome them.

Methods: We conducted seven focus group interviews with 23 critical care clinicians (70% nurses, 17% allied health professionals, 13% physicians). Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were thematically analysed using an inductive content analysis approach.

Findings: Results reveal a constant interplay between mostly positive personal attitudes towards implementation of integrative therapies and the perceived culture and priorities of the unit. The main benefits for critically ill patients as perceived by participants were promotion of comfort, sleep, and coping, increase of trust, and decrease of pain and stress. As for barriers, dominant themes were a perceived lack of evidence, cost, and time constraints and the fear of loss of professional credibility. Participants related nurses' education and training, family involvement, and leadership were seen as main strategies for implementation.

Conclusions: The dominant ICU culture needs to be considered when implementing integrative therapies. Education, access to evidence, and role modelling are proposed as means to shift the ICU culture towards utilisation of integrative therapies in critical care.

Keywords: Attitudes; Critical care; Health care professionals; Integrative therapies; Intensive care unit; Relaxation-inducing therapies.