The ubiquity of 'self-care' in health: Why specificity matters

Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan;19(1):2296970. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2296970. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

Abstract

Despite increased interest in self-care for health, little consensus exists around its definition and scope. The World Health Organization has published several definitions of self-care, including in a 2019 Global Guideline rooted in sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), later expanded to encompass health more generally. To establish a robust understanding of self-care, this exploratory study inventorises, consolidates, presents and analyses definitions of self-care beyond the SRHR field. A pragmatic review identified definitions and conceptualisations of self-care from peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2009 and 2021. The search identified 91 definitions of self-care from 116 relevant publications. Data extraction informed analysis to identify recurring themes and approaches, revealing three key areas of variation: self-care being: (1) defined directly or descriptively; (2) situated within individual, interpersonal or structural contexts; (3) defined broadly or topic-specifically. A multilevel conceptualisation can guide a more broadly applicable understanding of self-care: first, as an aspect of healthcare; second, as a concept operating at individual, interpersonal and institutional levels; third, as a concept that impacts specific health fields and contexts differently. A comprehensive but adaptable framework works in service of improving health and wellbeing for all, acknowledging the linkages between self-care and health-related human rights.

Keywords: Self-care; community-based care; health care; patient-centred-care; person-centred care.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Humans
  • Reproductive Health
  • Reproductive Rights
  • Right to Health*
  • Self Care*