Introduction/aims: The performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) remains controversial. Furthermore, the role of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) sequences is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (NE-MRI) protocol compared to a CE-MRI protocol in adult patients with confirmed IIM.
Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled patients with suspected IIM who underwent MRI of the upper thigh between 2008 and 2020. The protocol consisted of a T1-weighted (T1w) sequence, a turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequence and a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequence (CE-T1w). After randomly stratifying patients into a group with only the T1w and TIRM sequences available and another group with additional availability of CE-T1w, three blinded readers assessed the presence of IIM based on characteristic imaging features. Confirmation of the diagnosis was determined based on the 2017 ACR/EULAR criteria.
Results: Of the 80 patients (mean age 49.0 ± 21.1 years; 42 female, 38 male) included, 54 (67.5%) had a positive diagnosis of IIM. Cumulated sensitivity and specificity for MRI to detect IIM was 87.1% and 83.3% in the NE-MRI group versus 87.0% and 63.0% in the CE-MRI group. The group differences for sensitivity and specificity were non-significant for each of the three readers, respectively (p ≥ .081).
Discussion: NE-MRI detects suspected IIM with high diagnostic accuracy and performs equivalently to CE-MRI. Therefore, it may be appropriate to omit the use of contrast agents in MRI scans performed for suspected IIM.
Keywords: MRI; contrast agent; myositis; sensitivity; specificity.
© 2024 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.