Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) encompass a diverse group of disorders that can be difficult to classify due to heterogenous clinical, molecular, and biochemical manifestations. Untargeted metabolomics platforms have become a popular approach to analyze IEM patient samples because of their ability to detect many metabolites at once, accelerating discovery of novel biomarkers, and metabolic mechanisms of disease. However, there are concerns about the reproducibility of untargeted metabolomics research due to the absence of uniform reporting practices, data analyses, and experimental design guidelines. Therefore, we critically evaluated published untargeted metabolomic platforms used to characterize IEMs to summarize the strengths and areas for improvement of this technology as it progresses towards the clinical laboratory. A total of 96 distinct IEMs were collectively evaluated by the included studies. However, most of these IEMs were evaluated by a single untargeted metabolomic method, in a single study, with a limited cohort size (55/96, 57%). The goals of the included studies generally fell into two, often overlapping, categories: detecting known biomarkers from many biochemically distinct IEMs using a single platform, and detecting novel metabolites or metabolic pathways. There was notable diversity in the design of the untargeted metabolomic platforms. Importantly, the majority of studies reported adherence to quality metrics, including the use of quality control samples and internal standards in their experiments, as well as confirmation of at least some of their feature annotations with commercial reference standards. Future applications of untargeted metabolomics platforms to the study of IEMs should move beyond single-subject analyses, and evaluate reproducibility using a prospective, or validation cohort.
Keywords: Biomarker; Inborn errors of metabolism; Metabolomic methods; Quality; Research design; Untargeted metabolomics.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.