Experiences of people with diabetes mellitus of telehealth for diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Alexander Gerrie; Susan Bellman; Danielle Pollock

doi:10.11124/JBIES-23-00286

Experiences of people with diabetes mellitus of telehealth for diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic review protocol

JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Jan 5. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00286. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Alexander Gerrie¹, Susan Bellman², Danielle Pollock³

Affiliations

¹ Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
² JBI, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
³ Health Evidence Synthesis Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

PMID: 38174724
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00286

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of people with diabetes who utilized telehealth for diabetes management due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols rather than traditional in-person consultations.

Introduction: COVID-19 intensified globally from January 2020, eliciting a multinational response to infection control for health preservation, including social distancing in public areas and health care settings. The outcome had significant impact on the health care system, where people with chronic diseases, such as those with diabetes, were required to transition a majority of their care to telehealth to align with social restrictions.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative and mixed methods studies and theses of any research design and in any language that examine the experiences of adults with diabetes who transitioned from in-person consultations to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusions include pre-COVID-19 data; quantitative studies; secondary, tertiary, and all other gray literature.

Methods: A search of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Emcare (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (NCBI), and several ProQuest databases will be conducted. Studies from January 2020 onwards in any language will be assessed for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and screen titles and abstracts and full-text studies and assess the methodological quality of the included studies utilizing the JBI qualitative critical appraisal tool. The included studies will be synthesized utilizing JBI meta-aggregation, and the certainty of the findings will be assessed with ConQual.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023424667.