Background: Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is one of the common complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, which often recovers spontaneously. However, the course of its recovery has not been examined fully, especially in regard to the different ablation methods. We sought to compare the recovery course of PNI in cryoballoon, laser balloon, and radiofrequency ablation.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed 355 patients who suffered from PNI during AF ablation. PNI occurred during cryoballoon ablation (CB group) and laser balloon ablation (LB group) for a pulmonary vein isolation in 288 and 20 patients, and radiofrequency ablation for a superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (RF-SVC group) in 47 patients, respectively RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the estimated probability of PNI recovery after the procedure between the methods (p = 0.01). PNI recovered significantly earlier in the CB group, especially within 24 h and 3 months post-procedure (the percentage of the recovery within 24 h and 3 months: 49.7% and 71.5% in the CB group, 15.0% and 22.2% in the LB group, and 23.4% and 41.9% in the RF-SVC group, respectively). Persistent PNI after 12 months was observed in only seven patients in the CB group, one in the LB group, and four in the RF-SVC group, respectively.
Conclusion: PNI rarely persists over 12 months after AF ablation; however, there is a difference in the timing of its recovery. PNI recovers quicker with cryoballoon ablation than with laser balloon ablation or radiofrequency ablation of the SVC.
Keywords: Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Cryoballoon; Laser balloon; Phrenic nerve injury.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.