Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance

Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 18:14:1104410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Introduction: Difficult choices between two equally attractive options result in a cognitive discrepancy between dissonant cognitions such as preferences and actions often followed by a sense of psychological discomfort known as cognitive dissonance. It can lead to changes in the desirability of options: the chosen option becomes more desirable, whereas the rejected option is devalued. Despite the ample experimental evidence to show this effect, the neural mechanisms and timing of such choice-induced preference changes are not fully understood.

Methods: In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate the activity of the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), which has been associated with conflict monitoring and choice-induced preference changes in neuroimaging studies. Prior to a revised version of Brehm's free-choice paradigm, participants in two experiments underwent cathodal (inhibitory) or anodal (excitatory) tDCS of the pMFC compared to sham (placebo) stimulation prior to the choice phase.

Results: Our results showed that cathodal tDCS significantly decreased the choice-induced preference change relative to a sham, but only in direct comparisons of rejected options. No significant effect of anodal tDCS in comparison with sham was observed.

Discussion: This study replicates the general behavioral effect of cognitive dissonance and provide partial support for the theory of the pMFC contribution to choice-related cognitive dissonance and subsequent preference changes, with possible limitations of an under-sampling for the obtained effect size and an asymmetry in the inhibitory-excitatory effects of non-invasive tDCS.

Keywords: cognitive dissonance; decision making; free choice paradigm; medial frontal cortex (MFC); preference changes; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Grants and funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (No 22-18-00660, https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00660/).