How can community pharmacists be supported to manage skin conditions? A multistage stakeholder research prioritisation exercise

Jane Harvey; Zakia Shariff; Claire Anderson; Matthew J Boyd; Matthew J Ridd; Miriam Santer; Kim Suzanne Thomas; Ian Maidment; Paul Leighton

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071863

How can community pharmacists be supported to manage skin conditions? A multistage stakeholder research prioritisation exercise

BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):e071863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071863.

Authors

Jane Harvey¹, Zakia Shariff², Claire Anderson³, Matthew J Boyd³, Matthew J Ridd⁴, Miriam Santer⁵, Kim Suzanne Thomas⁶, Ian Maidment², Paul Leighton⁶

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK jane.harvey1@nottingham.ac.uk.
² Aston Pharmacy School, Aston University School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
³ Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
⁴ Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
⁵ Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
⁶ Centre for Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Abstract

Objective: To establish research priorities which will support the development and delivery of community pharmacy initiatives for the management of skin conditions.

Design: An iterative, multistage stakeholder consultation consisting of online survey, participant workshops and prioritisation meeting.

Setting: All data collection took place online with participants completing a survey (delivered via the JISC Online Survey platform, between July 2021 and January 2022) and participating in online workshops and meetings (hosted on Microsoft Teams between April and July 2022).

Participants: 174 community pharmacists and pharmacy staff completed the online survey.53 participants participated in the exploratory workshops (19 community pharmacists, 4 non-pharmacist members of pharmacy staff and 30 members of the public). 4 healthcare professionals who were unable to attend a workshop participated in a one-to-one interview.29 participants from the workshops took part in the prioritisation meeting (5 pharmacists/pharmacy staff, 1 other healthcare professional and 23 members of the public).

Results: Five broad areas of potential research need were identified in the online survey: (1) identifying and diagnosing skin conditions; (2) skin conditions in skin of colour; (3) when to refer skin conditions; (4) disease-specific concerns and (5) product-specific concerns.These were explored and refined in the workshops to establish 10 potential areas for research, which will support pharmacists in managing skin conditions. These were ranked in the prioritisation meeting. Among those prioritised were topics which consider how pharmacists work with other healthcare professionals to identify and manage skin conditions.

Conclusions: Survey responses and stakeholder workshops all recognised the potential for community pharmacists to play an active role in the management of common skin conditions. Future research may support this in the generation of resources for pharmacists, in encouraging public take-up of pharmacy services, and in evaluating the most effective provision for dealing with skin conditions.

Keywords: DERMATOLOGY; PRIMARY CARE; Patient Participation; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Community Pharmacy Services*
Humans
Pharmacies*
Pharmacists
Professional Role
Skin
Surveys and Questionnaires