Women's satisfaction with care in labour is a positive indicator for the woman herself, as well as healthcare organization as a whole. This study was aimed to find out the women's satisfaction with their childbirth. It also tried to identify significant differences across various mode of delivery and satisfaction related to women's childbirth experience. It was a descriptive type of cross-sectional study conducted among 278 post-natal mother who give live birth at government tertiary hospital namely Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh. The study was conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology during the period of January 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected from the respondents by face to face interview using a self-administered semi-structured questionnaire including Salmon's Item List. Level of overall satisfaction with childbirth was assessed by Salomon's Item List. Data analysis was carried out by SPSS version 25.0. The dimension of physical discomfort, emotional distress and fulfilment had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.746, 0.966 and 0.982 respectively. The internal consistency of each dimension was found to be acceptable and reliable. The mean scores of the dimensions in Salmon's Item List for Fulfilment, Emotional distress and Physical discomfort was found to be 69.20, 50.85 and 50.40 respectively. Higher total scores indicate a more positive evaluation of the childbirth experience and lower scores indicate a more negative evaluation. In this study the Overall mean scores of the three dimensions was 50.75. The mean scores of 'fulfillment' was higher in normal vaginal delivery (NVD) and scores of both "emotional distress" and "physical discomfort" were higher in lower uterine cesarean section (LUCS). Among all the three dimensions, mean scores of 'fulfillment' was higher in NVD indicating more satisfaction with NVD than LUCS and instrumental delivery. On the other hand, scores of "physical discomfort" and "emotional distress" were lower in NVD indicating less satisfaction with NVD than LUCS.