The Functional Balance Ability Measure: A Measure of Balance Across the Spectrum of Functional Mobility in Persons Post-Stroke

Jasmine J Cash; Craig A Velozo; Mark G Bowden; Bryant A Seamon

doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100296

The Functional Balance Ability Measure: A Measure of Balance Across the Spectrum of Functional Mobility in Persons Post-Stroke

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Sep 13;5(4):100296. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100296. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Authors

Jasmine J Cash^{1

2}, Craig A Velozo^{2

3}, Mark G Bowden⁴, Bryant A Seamon^{2

5}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
² Ralph H Johnson VA Health Care System, Charleston, SC.
³ Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
⁴ Department of Clinical Integration and Research, Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida.
⁵ Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the measurement properties of an instrument that combines items from the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) called the Functional Balance Ability Measure (FBAM) supports measuring balance across the functional mobility spectrum.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Item-level data were from an archival research database.

Participants: Ambulatory individuals (N=93, BBS=50 [29-56], FGA=16 [0-30], Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremities=27 [14-34], self-selected walking speed=0.4±0.2 m/s, mean age ± SD, 61.7±11.3y; 30.1% female) with chronic stroke (≥6 months).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Unidimensionality was evaluated with a principal components analysis (PCA) of residuals. FBAM rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation were investigated using the Andrich Rating Scale Model.

Results: PCA findings indicate the FBAM is sufficiently unidimensional. Rating scale structure was appropriate without modifying the original BBS and FGA scoring systems. Item hierarchy aligned with clinical and theoretical predictions (hardest item: FGA-gait with narrow base of support, easiest item: BBS-sitting unsupported). One item (BBS-standing on 1 foot) misfit, however, removal marginally affected person measures and model statistics. The FBAM demonstrated high person reliability (0.9) and 6 people (∼6%) misfit the expected response pattern. The FBAM separated participants into 4 statistically distinct strata, without a floor or ceiling effect.

Conclusions: The FBAM is a unidimensional measure for balance ability across a continuum of functional tasks. Rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation support the FBAM's measurement properties in persons with chronic stroke. Future work should investigate measurement with fewer items and whether the FBAM addresses barriers to adoption of standardized balance measures in clinical practice.

Keywords: Postural balance; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Stroke.

Abstract

Grants and funding