Comparative analysis of biochar carbon stability methods and implications for carbon credits

Sirjana Adhikari; Ellen Moon; Jorge Paz-Ferreiro; Wendy Timms

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169607

Comparative analysis of biochar carbon stability methods and implications for carbon credits

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 1:914:169607. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169607. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

Authors

Sirjana Adhikari¹, Ellen Moon², Jorge Paz-Ferreiro³, Wendy Timms⁴

Affiliations

¹ School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia; Centre for Sustainable Bioproducts, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia. Electronic address: adhikaris@deakin.edu.au.
² School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Enabling the Eco-efficient Beneficiation of Minerals, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia. Electronic address: ellen.moon@deakin.edu.au.
³ School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. Electronic address: jorge.paz-ferreiro@rmit.edu.au.
⁴ School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia; Centre for Sustainable Bioproducts, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia. Electronic address: wendy.timms@deakin.edu.au.

PMID: 38154640
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169607

Abstract

Biochar is an emerging negative emission technology. Its ability to sequester carbon and subsequent carbon credit valuation hinge on the stability of its carbon structure. The widely used indicators of carbon stability H:C_org and O:C_org provide conservative results as these are based on limited incubation experiments and associated modeling results. The results from these accepted methods and other derived methods have not been compared as indicators of carbon stability in a variety of biochar samples. Furthermore, the influence of contrasting feedstock and production techniques on biochar carbon stability is not well explored. Therefore, to address these challenges, a comprehensive stability analysis of 21 different biochar samples with contrasting feedstocks and pyrolysis techniques was conducted using a combination of instrumental methods and derived indicators of carbon stability. Methods such as biochar carbon half-life, thermo-stable fraction, oxidation resistance (R₅₀), and carbon sequestration potential (CS) were used. Based on the initial carbon content of the biochar, simple pyrolysis techniques have similar potential for carbon credits as biochar produced from advanced pyrolysis techniques. Results indicate that the carbon stability of a biochar product is primarily a factor of feedstock type. We found that biochar carbon stability is not related to volatile matter or fixed carbon content for biochar produced using a simple pyrolysis technique and mixed feedstock. Biochars with H:C_org < 0.4 were deemed to have lower carbon stability when compared using different methods. No correlation was observed between the carbon stability of biochar using H:C_org and other methods, however, correlations were observed between half-life, O:C_org, fixed carbon, number of aromatic peaks in FTIR spectrum, R_50, and CS. Therefore, it is recommended that data from additional incubation and modeling studies need to be considered to increase the confidence in carbon stability results having major implications to carbon credits.

Keywords: Carbon credits; Feedstock; Pyrolysis; Recalcitrance index; Soil carbon sequestration; Soil carbon storage.

MeSH terms

Carbon Sequestration
Carbon* / analysis
Charcoal* / chemistry
Pyrolysis
Soil / chemistry
Temperature

Substances

biochar
Carbon
Charcoal
Soil