Purpose: Although diagnostic stewardship issues in clinical microbiology harbor an optimization potential for anti-infective consumption, they are only marginally addressed in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs. As part of an AMS point prevalence (PPS) survey we therefore aimed to gain a more dynamic view on the microbiological awareness within therapeutic regimens. By examining whether initial microbiological sampling was performed and in which way microbiological results were incorporated into further treatment considerations we sought to find out to what extent these points determine the appropriateness of treatment regimens.
Methods: PPS was performed at the University Hospital Salzburg (1524 beds) in May 2021. Relevant data was determined from the patient charts and the appropriateness of anti-infective use was assessed using predefined quality indicators. Six months after the PPS, a questionnaire was administered to clinicians to obtain information on the use of microbiological findings and their relevance in the clinic.
Results: Lack of microbiological awareness in the clinical setting proved to be the key reason for an overall inadequate use of anti-infectives (35.4% of cases rated as inadequate), ahead of the aspects of dose (24.1%), empirical therapy (20.3%) and treatment duration (20.2%). This was particularly the case for broad-acting agents and was most evident in urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and pneumonia. The results of the questionnaire indicate a discrepancy between the physicians surveyed and the routine clinical setting.
Conclusion: A high potential in improving the use of anti-infectives in hospitals seems to lie in a strong emphasis on microbiological diagnostic stewardship measures.
Keywords: Antimicrobial stewardship; Antimicrobial treatment; Diagnostic stewardship; Microbiology.
© 2023. The Author(s).