Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nail: One or two cephalic screws?

Injury. 2023 Nov:54 Suppl 6:110625. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.008.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the incidence of cut-out, cut-in, cut-through, Z-effect, and reverse Z-effect in two cephalomedullary nail (CMN) systems: one with single cephalic screw fixation and the other with dual-screw fixation using a lag screw and an anti-rotation screw.

Methods: A retrospective study from a cohort of patients was conducted between January 2017 and August 2019 in patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with osteosynthesis using CMN.

Results: One hundred ninety-six patients with intertrochanteric fractures who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. The median age was 81 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12]. Seventy-six percent had fractures classified as Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (OTA/AO) 31A2. Twenty-one mechanical complications occurred, 8.7% (17) was cut-out with a single cephalic screw CMN and 2% (4) was Z-effect with a dual-screw CMN non-integrated. The median tip-apex distance (TAD) was 19.4 mm (IQR 10.8) in patients who experienced cut-out and 19 mm (IQR 10) in those who experienced Z-effect. The median time to cut-out occurrence was 39,5 days (IQR 47,5), while the median time to Z-effect was 90 days (IQR 86).

Conclusions: The incidence of osteosynthesis failure using CMN is more frequent in patients treated with a single cephalic screw CMN.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic, Level III.

Keywords: Cephalomedullary nail; Hip fracture; Intertrochanteric fracture.

MeSH terms

  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bone Nails / adverse effects
  • Bone Screws / adverse effects
  • Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary* / adverse effects
  • Hip Fractures* / diagnostic imaging
  • Hip Fractures* / etiology
  • Hip Fractures* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome