Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore factors that may influence a practice educator's assessment of an entry-to-practice pharmacy student during inpatient direct patient care practicums.
Methods: This was a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of existing practice educators from a variety of hospital practice environments. Participants were asked to assess a fictional case of a student's work, which provided a framework for a broader discussion of assessment practices. Interviews were transcribed and subjectively analyzed for themes and factors that each study participant considered for the case and in their past precepting experiences.
Results: A total of 13 participants consented and were interviewed. Identified themes included the quality of student work, key aspects of the student's performance, professionalism, and the complexity of the patient assigned to the student. There was significant heterogeneity in both the assessment of the fictional student and the factors that influenced each participant's assessment. It was clear that not all guidance provided by the academic institution is read or followed. Participants described challenges in applying the assessment rubric, including lack of time, training, resources, knowledge of the degree requirements/structure, and psychological factors inherent in high-stakes courses.
Conclusion: Complex, varied, and often contradictory factors are used by experiential practice educators in their assessment of pharmacy students on practicum. These findings lead to inconsistency and heterogeneity when assessing a mock case and actual students. Educators should consider mandatory training to ensure those who assess students have an understanding of practicum course expectations and assessments.
Keywords: Clinical education; Experiential; Performance assessment; Practicum; Rater judgments.
Copyright © 2024 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. All rights reserved.