Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Dec 21:S1053-2498(23)02175-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.12.006. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: In pediatric heart transplant (PHT), cardiac catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is standard for diagnosing acute rejection (AR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) but is costly and invasive.

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to noninvasively identify differences in PHT patients with AR and CAV.

Methods: Patients were enrolled at three children's hospitals. Data were collected from surveillance EMB or EMB for-cause AR. Patients were excluded if they had concurrent diagnoses of AR and CAV, CMR obtained >7days from AR diagnosis, they had EMB negative AR, or could not undergo contrasted, unsedated CMR. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups: (1) No AR or CAV (Healthy), (2) AR, (3) CAV. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for pairwise comparisons.

Results: Fifty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (median age 17years [IQR 15-19]) 10 (17%) with AR, and 11 (19%) with CAV. AR subjects had worse left ventricular ejection fraction compared to Healthy patients (p = 0.001). Global circumferential strain (GCS) was worse in AR (p = 0.054) and CAV (p = 0.019), compared to Healthy patients. ECV, native T1, and T2 z-scores were elevated in patients with AR.

Conclusions: CMR was able to identify differences between CAV and AR. CAV subjects had normal global function but abnormal GCS which may suggest subclinical dysfunction. AR patients have abnormal function and tissue characteristics consistent with edema (elevated ECV, native T1 and T2 z-scores). Characterization of CMR patterns is critical for the development of noninvasive biomarkers for PHT and may decrease dependence on EMB.

Keywords: acute rejection; cardiac allograft vasculopathy; cardiac magnetic resonance; cardiac transplant.