Background: In recent times during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, e-learning is increasingly being used to give oral health education. However, the efficacy of e-learning in improving and promoting the oral hygiene and oral health knowledge, attitude and practice is unclear. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to clarify the effectiveness of e-learning compared to other conventional education methods for providing oral health.
Methods: An electronic database search was performed on PubMed-Medline, Scopus, and CENTRAL (Central Register Cochrane of Controlled trials). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster or group RCTs, were collected in this study. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Five different meta-analyses were conducted for plaque index, gingival index, oral health knowledge, oral health attitude, and oral health practice using a random effects model.
Results: A total of 282 articles were found through the database search; 19 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis and 9 articles in the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis found that compared with conventional education, e-learning exhibited no positive effect. However, the use of e-learning was superior to conventional education methods for oral health practice for adults in subgroup analysis.
Conclusions: This paper could not indicate the effectiveness of e-learning in comparison with conventional education for oral health in total. However, for adults, it may be effective to get the oral health practice compared to the conventional education. Our study limitation is that there are only few studies that have assessed the effectiveness of e-learning. Therefore, numerous further high-quality studies should be conducted regarding the efficacy of e-learning compared with conventional education methods for oral health promotion.
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.