Random Mutational Analysis Targeting Residue K155 within the Transmembrane β-Hairpin of the Mosquitocidal Mpp46Ab Toxin

Biology (Basel). 2023 Dec 1;12(12):1481. doi: 10.3390/biology12121481.

Abstract

Mpp46Ab is a mosquito-larvicidal pore-forming toxin derived from Bacillus thuringiensis TK-E6. Pore formation is believed to be a central mode of Mpp46Ab action, and the cation selectivity of the channel pores, in particular, is closely related to its mosquito-larvicidal activity. In the present study, we constructed a mutant library in which residue K155 within the transmembrane β-hairpin was randomly replaced with other amino acid residues. Upon mutagenesis and following primary screening using Culex pipiens mosquito larvae, we obtained 15 mutants in addition to the wild-type toxin. Bioassays using purified proteins revealed that two mutants, K155E and K155I, exhibited toxicity significantly higher than that of the wild-type toxin. Although increased cation selectivity was previously reported for K155E channel pores, we demonstrated in the present study that the cation selectivity of K155I channel pores was also significantly increased. Considering the characteristics of the amino acids, the charge of residue 155 may not directly affect the cation selectivity of Mpp46Ab channel pores. Replacement of K155 with glutamic acid or isoleucine may induce a similar conformational change in the region associated with the ion selectivity of the Mpp46Ab channel pores. Mutagenesis targeting the transmembrane β-hairpin may be an effective strategy for enhancing the ion permeability of the channel pores and the resulting mosquito-larvicidal activity of Mpp46Ab.

Keywords: Bacillus thuringiensis TK-E6; Culex pipiens mosquito larvae; electrophysiologic analysis; mosquito-larvicidal toxin; site-directed mutagenesis.

Grants and funding

This work was supported in part by research grants from the Okayama Foundation for Science and Technology (2021), the Yakumo Foundation for Environmental Science (2021), and JSPS KAKENHI (number 22K05676). The funding agencies had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.