Background: Diffractive microscopy creates contrast within samples that are otherwise uniform under bright light. This technique can highlight subtle differences in refractive indices within birefringent samples containing varying amounts of mature collagen. Dermatofibroma (DF) and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) possess differences in their mature collagen content and, therefore, may be distinguishable using diffractive microscopy.
Methods: Two hundred forty-two DF and 85 DFSP hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained specimens were analyzed using diffractive microscopy. Data regarding the distribution pattern and strength of refractility was recorded.
Results: DFSP was more frequently found to be focally, weakly, or non-refractile (82.9%; n = 68) under diffractive microscopy, while DF more often showed diffusely bright refractility (52.9%; n = 128). DFSP samples with diffuse refractility in portions of the lesion (17.1%; n = 14) also exhibited a unique checkerboard pattern distinct from that which was seen in DF samples.
Conclusions: The absence of diffuse refractility was more closely associated with DFSP, as was the presence of a unique checkerboard diffraction pattern. Despite high sensitivity (Sn = 82.9%), absent refractility was not a specific test (Sp = 52.9%), with 47.1% (n = 114) of DF samples sharing this feature. The distinction between DF and DFSP is often diagnosed using H&E alone. In difficult cases, examination of collagen under diffractive microscopy may be useful in distinguishing DFSP from DF and provide an alternative cost-effective tool to immunohistochemical staining.
Keywords: dermatofibroma; dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans; diffraction; microscopy; refractility.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.