Does the expensive brain hypothesis apply to amphibians and reptiles?

BMC Ecol Evol. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12862-023-02188-w.

Abstract

Vertebrate brains show extensive variation in relative size. The expensive brain hypothesis argues that one important source of this variation is linked to a species' ability to generate the energy required to sustain the brain, especially during periods of unavoidable food scarcity. Here we ask whether this hypothesis, tested so far in endothermic vertebrates, also applies to ectotherms, where ambient temperature is an additional major aspect of energy balance. Phylogenetic comparative analyses of reptiles and amphibians support the hypothesis. First, relative brain size increases with higher body temperature in those species active during the day that can gain free energy by basking. Second, relative brain size is smaller among nocturnal species, which generally face less favorable energy budgets, especially when maintaining high body temperature. However, we do not find an effect of seasonal variation in ambient temperature or food on brain size, unlike in endotherms. We conclude that the factors affecting energy balance in ectotherms and endotherms are overlapping but not identical. We therefore discuss the idea that when body temperatures are seasonally very low, cognitive benefits may be thwarted and selection on larger brain size may be rare. Indeed, mammalian hibernators may show similarities to ectotherms.

Keywords: Ambient temperature; Brain size; Brumation; Ectothermy; Expensive brain; Hibernation; Nocturnality; Seasonality.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amphibians*
  • Animals
  • Brain
  • Mammals
  • Phylogeny
  • Reptiles*
  • Vertebrates