Objectives: Tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) is inflammation of the pelvic organs, mainly originating from the lower genital tract and intestinal tract. Treatment options include antibiotic therapy, surgical drainage, and radiologically guided (interventional) drainage. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the treatment method to be chosen and thus to manage patients with tuba ovarian abscesses (TOAs) most accurately.
Material and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, and patients who applied to a tertiary center diagnosed with tuba ovarian abscess (TOA) were included. TOA size (cm), pre-treatment C-reactive protein (CRP) value, pre-treatment white blood cell (WBC) value, previous operation type, postoperative complication, and antibiotics used were screened.
Results: 305 patients were included in the study, and medical treatment was applied to 140 patients, organ-sparing surgical drainage to 50 patients, and surgical treatment to 115 patients. TOA dimensions measured at the time of diagnosis were significantly lower in patients for whom only medical treatment was sufficient. Pre-treatment CRP levels, WBC levels, and length of stay were significantly lower in patients for whom only medical treatment was sufficient. There was no significant difference between the pre-and post-procedure CRP difference, antibiotics, and hospitalization time.
Conclusions: Preferring minimally invasive treatment in cases requiring invasive treatment reduces the frequency of complications. Treatment of tuba ovarian abscesses (TOA) with minimally invasive methods will be more beneficial in terms of patient morbidity.
Keywords: minimally invasive treatment; surgical drainage; tubo-ovarian abscess.