Marginalising dyslexic researchers is bad for science

Elife. 2023 Dec 15:12:e93980. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93980.

Abstract

Communication in the sciences is often based on text, which places researchers with dyslexia at a disadvantage. However, this means that science is missing out on the original insights and specific strengths in exploration that dyslexic researchers bring to their disciplines. Here we discuss how the scientific community can address the challenges that dyslexic researchers face, and how science stands to benefit as a result. We discuss this in the context of a new theoretical framework proposing the existence of complementary learning strategies that could play a key role in scientific progress, particularly with regard to accelerating innovation.

Keywords: AI assitive tools; dyslexia; evolution; exploartive learning; learning; neurodiversity; neuroscience.

MeSH terms

  • Communication
  • Dyslexia*
  • Humans
  • Reading

Grants and funding

No external funding was received for this work.