Could reasons for admission help to screen unhealthy alcohol use in emergency departments? A multicenter French study

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 30:14:1271076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1271076. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: Many patients admitted to general emergency departments (EDs) have a pattern of drinking that could lead to future alcohol-related complications. However, it is often difficult to screen these patients in the context of emergency. The aim of this study is to analyze whether reasons for admission could help to screen patients who have an unhealthy alcohol use.

Method: Patients were recruited among six public hospital ED in France, between 2012 and 2014. During a one-month period in each hospital, anonymous questionnaires including sociodemographic questions, AUDIT-C and RAPS4-QF were administered to each patients visiting the ED. The reason for admission of each patient was noted at the end of their questionnaire by the ED practitioner.

Results: Ten thousand Four hundred twenty-one patients were included in the analysis. Patients who came to the ED for injuries and mental disorders were more likely to report unhealthy alcohol use than non-harmful use or no use. Among male patients under 65 years old admitted to the ED for a mental disorder, 24.2% drank more than four drinks (40 g ethanol) in typical day at least four time a week in the last 12 months. Among these patients, 79.7% reported daily or almost daily heavy episodic drinking (HED, 60 g ethanol), and all were positive on the RAPS4-QF.

Conclusion: This study highlights that unhealthy alcohol use is frequent among ED patients and particularly among those who come for injuries or mental disorders. Men under 65 years old with a mental disorder require special attention because of their increased prevalence of daily or almost daily HED.

Keywords: alcohol drinking; alcohol use disorder; alcohol-related complications; emergency department; heavy episodic drinking; mental disorder.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was funded by an inter-regional public grant (PHRC interregional Auvergne - Rhône-Alpes 2012). The funder had no role in the writing of the study protocol or in the conductance of the study.