Neurologic Outcomes and Quality of Life in Children After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Abstract

Rationale: Use of life support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with brain injury. However, the consequences of these injuries on subsequent neurologic development and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are poorly described in children.

Objectives: The aim of this preliminary study was to describe short- and long-term neurologic outcomes in survivors of ECMO, as well as their HRQoL.

Design: Retrospective identified cohort with contemporary evaluations.

Setting: Necker Children's Hospital academic PICU.

Patients: Forty survivors who underwent ECMO (October 2014 to January 2020) were included in follow-up assessments in May 2021.

Interventions: None.

Measurement and main results: We first reviewed the outcomes of ECMO at the time of PICU discharge, which included a summary of neurology, radiology, and Pediatric Overall/Cerebral Performance Category (POPC/PCPC) scores. Then, in May 2021, we interviewed parents and patients to assess HRQoL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL]) and POPC/PCPC for children 3 years old or older, and Denver II test (DTII) for younger children. An evaluation of DTII in the youngest patients 1 year after ECMO decannulation was also added. Median age at ECMO was 1.4 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.4-6 yr). Thirty-five children (88%) underwent a venoarterial ECMO. At PICU discharge, 15 of 40 patients (38%) had neurologic impairment. Assessment of HRQoL was carried out at median of 1.6 years (IQR, 0.7-3.3 yr) after PICU discharge. PedsQL scores were over 70 of 100 for all patients (healthy peers mean results: 80/100), and scores were like those published in patients suffering with chronic diseases. In May 2021, seven of 15 patients had a normal DTII, and 36 of 40 patients had a POPC/PCPC score less than or equal to 3.

Conclusions: None of our patients presented severe disability at long term, and HRQoL evaluation was reassuring. Considering the risk of neurologic impairment after ECMO support, a systematic follow-up of these high-risk survivor patients would be advisable.