Rudolph, the kids' ward reindeer: a scoping review of the effects of support animals on the well-being of healthcare staff

Thomas C Erren; Jonas Wallraff; Ursula Wild; David M Shaw; Philip Lewis

doi:10.1186/s12995-023-00395-1

Rudolph, the kids' ward reindeer: a scoping review of the effects of support animals on the well-being of healthcare staff

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023 Dec 12;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00395-1.

Authors

Thomas C Erren¹, Jonas Wallraff², Ursula Wild², David M Shaw^{3

4}, Philip Lewis²

Affiliations

¹ Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. tim.erren@uni-koeln.de.
² Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
³ Department of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Switzerland.
⁴ Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract

Background: Many systematic reviews identify support animals or animal assisted activity as a beneficial and standard practice in several medical disciplines for patients (children, adolescents, and adults) and residents in care homes. A variety of animals are used such as dogs, cats, ponies, horses, alpacas, reindeer, penguins, rabbits, and tarantulas. Our objective was to explore the evidence regarding effects of animal assisted activity on a further population of interest; namely, healthcare staff.

Methods: We asked the question "how do support animals in healthcare settings affect the well-being of healthcare staff?" As an addendum, we were also interested in what - possibly more unique - animals have visited healthcare settings at Christmas time in particular. We conducted a scoping literature review using PubMed and Web of Science (search as of 26 April 2023). RESULTS: Twenty studies (in the USA, Australia, Europe; dogs: n = 19; cats: n = 1) since 2002 included: studies with biological measures (n = 3), longitudinal survey studies with analyses (n = 5), cross-sectional survey studies with analyses (n = 2), and cross-sectional survey studies with descriptive statistics (n = 10). Overall, animal assisted activities appear to be well-received by staff and there do not seem to be negative impacts on staff well-being.

Conclusions: Relevant positive effects and avenues of research are identified. Our review suggests that, but not exactly how, animal assisted activity benefits staff. Study evidence is limited with most studies being cross-sectional, descriptive, having low participant numbers, and mostly only involving dogs. Nonetheless, the evidence is mostly positive. The potential of animal assisted activities impacting positively on staff well-being warrants systematic research. Gaps in hard-fact-evidence should not deter us - especially at the festive season - to encourage work with, and systematic research regarding, support animals that provide warmth, empathy, comfort, and more in healthcare settings.

Keywords: Animal assisted activity; Animal assisted therapy; Healthcare staff; Support animal.