Proprioception plays a key role in motor control and stroke recovery. Robotic devices are increasingly being used to improve proprioceptive assessments, but there is a lack of knowledge about how programmable factors such as testing range, speed, and prior exposure affect tests. From a physiological standpoint, such factors may regulate the sensitivity of limb proprioceptors, thereby influencing assessment results when not controlled for. To determine the relative influence of such factors, we studied the Crisscross proprioceptive assessment, a recently developed robotic assessment that requires participants to indicate when two joints pass by each other as they are moved passively by the robot. We implemented Crisscross with novel robots for the fingers and ankles and tested young unimpaired participants in single sessions (N = 16) and longitudinally (N = 5, across 15-30 sessions over 3-10 weeks). In single-session testing, we found that proprioceptive acuity was better for the fingers than the ankle (p < 0.01). For both limbs, acuity improved near the ends of the range of motion, which may be due to greater involvement of load and joint receptors. Acuity was poorer for slower movements due to greater anticipatory errors. These results show how the range and speed selected for a proprioceptive test affect proprioceptive acuity and highlight the heightened role of anticipatory errors at slow speeds. Improvements in proprioceptive acuity were not detectable in a single session, but acuity improved across multiple testing sessions (p < 0.01). This result shows that multiple prior exposure over at least several days can affect acuity.Clinical Relevance- Proprioceptive assessments should account for range and speed, which could be enabled by leveraging robotics technology. Proprioceptive acuity can be improved through repeated testing, an observation that is relevant to proprioceptive rehabilitation as well.