Large high pressure die castings (HPDC), recently referred to as mega-castings, can replace plenty of steel metal sheets usually employed for body-in-white (BIW) structures. They can save manufacturing expense and unleash additional lightweight potential thanks to additional design freedom and material properties. The BIW plays a major role in automotive design since it must fulfill numerous structural targets ranging from stiffness for vehicle dynamics, dynamic responses for NVH (noise, vibration, harshness), driving comfort standards and several passive safety requirements. The use of mega-casting structures leads to additional requirements with respect to castability and material quality. Achieving a lightweight design considering requirements related to crash or castability is a challenge on its own, due to the high computational cost of related simulation techniques. Considering multiple requirements simultaneously, therefore often leads to non-weight-optimal structures. To exploit the full lightweight potential, we present a generative multidisciplinary optimization pipeline for the structural design of automotive mega-casting parts in this paper. The approach combines established methods in automotive industry such as topology optimization and response-surface-based (RSM) optimization and enhances the latter by machine learning (ML) based clustering and classification. In a first step topology optimization is employed to derive optimal load-paths for multidisciplinary loading conditions. For this purpose, casting manufacturing constraints as well as more than hundred linearized loads are used to incorporate NVH and passive safety requirements. In a next step the optimal thickness distribution and rib orientation of the structure is achieved using RSM optimization algorithms for the computationally expensive nonlinear crash and casting simulations. Performance indicators are treated by unsupervised learning based on clustering. This enables classification constraints based on simulation field results from hundreds of samples to be included into RSM optimization. It resolves a typical risk of pure scalar, regression-type targets, where supposed optimal results fail when domain experts examine the full field result of the corresponding simulation. It is shown how this approach is superior in achieving a weight-optimal design and turnaround time compared to a design workflow classically used for BIW structures.
© 2023. The Author(s).