Improving model-data mismatch for photon-counting detector model using global and local model parameters

Med Phys. 2024 Feb;51(2):964-977. doi: 10.1002/mp.16883. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

Abstract

Background: An energy-discriminating capability of a photon counting detector (PCD) can provide many clinical advantages, but several factors, such as charge sharing (CS) and pulse pileup (PP), degrade the capability by distorting the measured x-ray spectrum. To fully exploit the merits of PCDs, it is important to characterize the output of PCDs. Previously proposed PCD output models showed decent agreement with physical PCDs; however, there were still scopes to be improved: a global model-data mismatch and pixel-to-pixel variations.

Purposes: In this study, we improve a PCD model by using count-rate-dependent model parameters to address the issues and evaluate agreement against physical PCDs.

Methods: The proposed model is based on the cascaded model, and we made model parameters condition-dependent and pixel-specific to deal with the global model-data mismatch and the pixel-to-pixel variation. The parameters are determined by a procedure for model parameter estimation with data acquired from different thicknesses of water or aluminum at different x-ray tube currents. To analyze the effects of having proposed model parameters, we compared three setups of our model: a model with default parameters, a model with global parameters, and a model with global-and-local parameters. For experimental validation, we used CdZnTe-based PCDs, and assessed the performance of the models by calculating the mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) between the model outputs and the actual measurements from low count-rates to high count-rates, which have deadtime losses of up to 24%.

Results: The outputs of the proposed model visually matched well with the PCD measurements for all test data. For the test data, the MAPEs averaged over all the bins were 49.2-51.1% for a model with default parameters, 8.0-9.8% for a model with the global parameters, and 1.2-2.7% for a model with the global-and-local parameters.

Conclusion: The proposed model can estimate the outputs of physical PCDs with high accuracy from low to high count-rates. We expect that our model will be actively utilized in applications where the pixel-by-pixel accuracy of a PCD model is important.

Keywords: charge sharing; computed tomography; photon counting detectors; pulse pileup.

MeSH terms

  • Photons*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods
  • X-Rays