Olfactory system-inspired electronic nose system using numerous low-cost homogenous and hetrogenous sensors

PLoS One. 2023 Dec 8;18(12):e0295703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295703. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

This paper presents an electronic nose system inspired by the biological olfactory system. When comparing the human olfactory system to that of a dog, it's worth noting that dogs have 30 times more olfactory receptors and three times as many types of olfactory receptors. This implies that the number of olfactory receptors could be a more important parameter for classifying chemical compounds than the number of receptor types. Instead of using expensive precision sensors, the proposed electronic nose system relies on numerous low-cost homogeneous and heterogeneous sensors with poor cross-interference characteristics due to their low gas selectivity. Even if the same type of sensor shows a slightly different output for the same chemical compound, this variation becomes a unique signal for the target gas being measured. The electronic nose system comprises 30 sensors, the e-nose had 6 differing sensors with 5 replicates of each type. The characteristics of the electronic nose system are evaluated using three different volatile alcoholic compounds, more than 99% of which are the same. Liquid samples are supplied to the sensor chamber for 60 seconds using an air bubbler, followed by a 60-second cleaning of the chamber. Sensor signals are acquired at a sampling rate of 100 Hz. In this experimental study, the effects of data preprocessing methods and the number of sensors of the same type are investigated. By increasing the number of sensors of the same type, classification accuracy exceeds 99%, regardless of the deep learning model. The proposed electronic nose system, based on low-cost sensors, demonstrates similar results to commercial expensive electronic nose systems.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Dogs
  • Electronic Nose
  • Humans
  • Olfactory Receptor Neurons*
  • Receptors, Odorant*

Substances

  • Receptors, Odorant

Grants and funding

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1F1A1072693) and by the Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE)(2022RIS-005).” The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.