Background: Even though the use of nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery is not the gold standard to prevent damage to the nerve, it surely offers some advantages over the traditional approach. Different from thyroid surgery, where a series of steps in intraoperative nerve monitoring have been described to confirm not only the integrity but-most importantly-the function of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, in parotid gland surgery, a formal guideline to follow while dissecting the facial nerve has yet to be described.
Methods: A five-year retrospective study was done reviewing the intraoperative records of patients who underwent parotid gland surgery under neural monitoring. The operative findings regarding the neuromonitoring process, particularly in regard to the amplitude of two main branches, were revised. A literature search was done to search for guidelines to follow when a facial nerve loss of signal is encountered.
Results: Fifty-five patients were operated on using the Nim 3 Nerve Monitoring System (Medtronic); 31 were female patients, and 47 patients had benign lesions. Minimum changes were observed in the amplitude records after a comparison was made between the first and the last stimulation. There were only three articles discussing the term loss of signal during parotid gland surgery.
Conclusion: Today, no sufficient attention has been given to the facial nerve monitoring process during parotidectomy. This study proposes a formal guideline to follow during this procedure as well as an instruction to consider when a loss of signal is observed to develop a uniform technique of facial nerve stimulation.
Keywords: amplitude; facial nerve; intraoperative neural monitoring; latency; loss of signal; nerve monitoring; parotid gland.
© 2023 The Authors. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology ‐ Head and Neck Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Chinese Medical Association.