High-throughput sequencing has had an enormous impact on small RNA research during the past decade. However, sequencing only offers a one-dimensional view of the transcriptome and is often highly biased. Additionally, the 'sequence, map and annotate' approach, used widely in small RNA research, can lead to flawed interpretations of the data, lacking biological plausibility, due in part to database issues. Even in the absence of technical biases, the loss of three-dimensional information is a major limitation to understanding RNA stability, turnover and function. For example, noncoding RNA-derived fragments seem to exist mainly as dimers, tetramers or as nicked forms of their parental RNAs, contrary to widespread assumptions. In this perspective, we will discuss main sources of bias during small RNA-sequencing, present several useful bias-reducing strategies and provide guidance on the interpretation of small RNA-sequencing results, with emphasis on RNA fragmentomics. As sequencing offers a one-dimensional projection of a four-dimensional reality, prior structure-level knowledge is often needed to make sense of the data. Consequently, while less-biased sequencing methods are welcomed, integration of orthologous experimental techniques is also strongly recommended.
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.