Objective: In preliminary studies, advanced intracranial stents appear to have a favorable safety profile for intracranial aneurysm treatment. This dual-center study is a head-to-head comparison of the low-profile Acandis Acclino stent (a third-generation stent) and the first- and second-generation Enterprise stent.
Methods: Patients who underwent stent-assisted coiling with either the Enterprise or the Acclino stent for unruptured aneurysms during an 8-year period were enrolled and compared for complications, clinical outcomes, and angiographic results. Primary outcome measures were ischemic stroke rate and mid-term complete occlusion rate. Propensity score adjustment was performed to account for small differences between the groups.
Results: Enterprise and Acclino stents were used in 48 cases each. The overall rate of thrombotic complications was higher in the Enterprise group than in the Acclino group (20.8% vs. 4.2%, HR: 6.6, 95%CI: 2.2-20.0, P = 0.01, adjusted P < 0.01), which translated into a higher rate of major ischemic stroke after Enterprise treatment (6.3% vs. 0%, HR: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.8-2.4, P = 0.08, adjusted P < 0.01). Mid-term and long-term angiographic follow-up showed complete occlusion rates of 83.3% and 75.0% for Enterprise and 89.2% and 75.9% for Acclino (both P > 0.05). Retreatment rates were 10.4% in the Enterprise group and 4.2% in the Acclino group (P = 0.42, adjusted P = 0.10).
Conclusions: The results indicate a favorable safety profile of the Acclino over the Enterprise, justifying the use of advanced stent systems in clinical practice. However, further comparative studies of the Acclino and other competing stent systems are needed to draw a definitive conclusion on the state of stent-assisted coiling.
Keywords: Aneurysm; Angiography; Endovascular; Low-profile; Stent-assisted coiling.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.