Support for criminalization of self-managed abortion (SMA): A national representative survey

M Antonia Biggs; Andréa Becker; Rosalyn Schroeder; Shelly Kaller; Karen Scott; Daniel Grossman; Sarah Raifman; Lauren Ralph

doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116433

Support for criminalization of self-managed abortion (SMA): A national representative survey

Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan:340:116433. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116433. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

Authors

M Antonia Biggs¹, Andréa Becker², Rosalyn Schroeder³, Shelly Kaller³, Karen Scott⁴, Daniel Grossman³, Sarah Raifman³, Lauren Ralph³

Affiliations

¹ Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. Electronic address: antonia.biggs@ucsf.edu.
² Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA; Department of Sociology, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Ave NY, NY, 10065, USA.
³ Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
⁴ Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA; Birthing Cultural Rigor, LLC, Nashville, TN, 37209, USA.

PMID: 38039765
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116433

Abstract

Objective: Since the U.S. Supreme Court eliminated the federal right to abortion, there is a heightened need to understand public opinion about the criminalization of people who attempt to end their pregnancies outside the formal healthcare setting, referred to as self-managed abortion (SMA). We assessed U.S. attitudes about whether three forms of SMA should be legal, reported or punished: 1) using abortion pills obtained outside the healthcare system, 2) using other medications, drugs, herbs, or by drinking alcohol, and 3) using traumatic methods (inserting an object in their body or hitting their stomach).

Methods: From December 2021 to January 2022, we administered a national probability-based online survey to English- and Spanish-speaking people assigned female (AFAB, ages 15-49) or male at birth (AMAB, ages 18-49) regarding their attitudes about criminalizing SMA, using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel. We estimated weighted proportions and conducted multivariable regression analyses to identify characteristics associated with support for SMA legality and punishment (reporting to authorities, paying a fine or going to jail).

Results: A total of 7,016 AFAB and 360 AMAB completed the survey. People were less likely (p < .05) to agree that SMA using abortion pills should be illegal (34% of AFAB and 43% of AMAB) than other forms of SMA (36-48%), although over one-fifth were unsure (AFAB, 20-23% and AMAB, 24-27%). People were less likely to agree SMA using abortion pills should be criminalized than SMA using other drugs, medications, herbs, alcohol or by using traumatic methods. In multivariable analyses, AMAB and Christian religion were associated with agreeing that SMA using abortion pills should be illegal; people who identified as Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity and experienced medical mistreatment were less likely to agree SMA with medication abortion pills should be illegal.

Conclusions: Public support for criminalizing SMA is complex and varied by SMA method and form of punishment.

Keywords: Abortion attitudes; Criminalization; Medication abortion; Self-managed abortion.

MeSH terms

Abortion, Induced* / methods
Abortion, Legal
Attitude
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Pregnancy
Public Opinion
Self-Management*