With the advancement in our understanding of the causative agents involved with cancer, there has been a considerable amount of debate within the laboratory and cytology community regarding how best to screen for cervical cancer. This paper attempts to review the three different approaches to cervical cancer screening through the lens of the four facie prima principles of biomedical ethics, including the respect for autonomy, principle of beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Analyzing the debate on cervical cancer screening platforms through the lens of the four principles of biomedical ethics ensures a comprehensive examination of all facets of the discussion, including a review of not only benefits and harm but also ensures that the final policy is fair and respectful for all the stakeholders. The conclusion from the analysis favors the use of co-testing but also supports making HPV primary and Pap testing viable options, depending on the needs of the community, patients, and providers.